An epidemiological application of Popper's method.
نویسنده
چکیده
The strong logicodeductive method of science is applied in an investigation of the mortality of a large population of communications workers (338 306 white men) to explain the mortality deficits so often observed in occupational studies. A theory for the healthy worker effect is proposed, and its predictions are tested in comparisons of mortality curves fitted to Weibull functions using regression techniques. The theory, based on the effect of selection on prevalent chronic disease, successfully predicts that as age increases the mortality rates of an employed population soon after hire will diverge from those of a general population. This new finding was observed for mortality from all causes, all causes minus accidents, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers. The theory successfully predicts the rate of decrease of the healthy worker effect as duration of service increases and the relative magnitudes of the effect by cause. Having survived initial empirical testing, this explanation for the effects of selection on occupational mortality meets at least two criteria (only one being sufficient) for deciding whether an explanation is to be preferred: it has made more precise predictions, and it has made new predictions not previously suggested.
منابع مشابه
Popper's philosophy for epidemiologists.
This paper discusses the application of Popper's philosophy to epidemiological research, examining in particular the problems of replication without risk of refutation, of mistaking statistical sophistication for deductive inference, and of dealing with causality at a general level. An example is given of a Popperian approach to the test of a causal hypothesis concerning cancer of the cervix.
متن کاملEpidemiological reasoning. Comments on 'Popper's philosophy for epidemiologists' by Carol Buck.
The two quotations summarize my reactions to Dr. Carol Buck's stimulating paper on 'Popper's philosophy for epidemiologists'. There would be little disagreement as to the desirability of enriching the scope and discipline of epidemiology by applying the ideas of several of the philosophers of science. On the other hand, might there not be a danger of rigidity, of too strict an application of pr...
متن کاملPhilosophy and phylogenetic inference: a comparison of likelihood and parsimony methods in the context of Karl Popper's writings on corroboration.
Advocates of cladistic parsimony methods have invoked the philosophy of Karl Popper in an attempt to argue for the superiority of those methods over phylogenetic methods based on Ronald Fisher's statistical principle of likelihood. We argue that the concept of likelihood in general, and its application to problems of phylogenetic inference in particular, are highly compatible with Popper's phil...
متن کاملExperimental realization of Popper ’ s experiment : Violation of the uncertainty principle ? ”
Application of the uncertainty principle to conditional measurements is investigated, and found to be valid for measurements on separated subsystems. In light of this, an apparent violation of the uncertainty principle obtained by Kim and Shih in their realization of Popper's experiment [1] is explained through analogy with a simple optical system.
متن کاملFalsifications and corroborations: Karl Popper's influence on systematics.
Over the last three decades, the philosophy of Karl Raimund Popper has had a strong influence on the field of systematic biology. Unequivocally, no other philosopher's work has had such an influence during this formative period in systematics. Much, but not all, of the early discourse on Popper and systematics dealt with the philosophical basis of systematics as a science. More recently Popper'...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of epidemiology and community health
دوره 39 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1985